I will assign two reports for each of you to review. Your job as a reviewer is to make sure the report is of high enough quality to be published. Be kind but honest. If there are errors in the report that don't get fixed because you don't catch them, then you are partly responsible.
To review a report, find the page and read it. Click the "..." button to see what tags, if any, the authors have used. Add any that you think are appropriate. Then click on the "Discussion" button for that page (to the right of the "Edit" button). Write a message with subject "Review". In a paragraph or two, address each of these questions. If there are any problems that need to be corrected, politely describe what corrections the writers should make.
Questions to answer
1. Does the report have all the required sections: Title, Introduction, Procedure, Results, and Conclusion (or a format that better fits the particular report)?
2. Is all of the spelling and grammar correct? Does the format match the template (text styles, horizontal lines, table of contents, etc.)
3. Does the introduction contain adequate background information and the purpose of the experiment?
4. Is the procedure detailed enough, and is it written in past tense, paragraph form?
5. Do the results include all the important data or observations?
6. Are the conclusions supported by the results of the experiment? Do the authors suggest further experiments?
Guidelines for Peer Review
I will assign two reports for each of you to review. Your job as a reviewer is to make sure the report is of high enough quality to be published. Be kind but honest. If there are errors in the report that don't get fixed because you don't catch them, then you are partly responsible.
To review a report, find the page and read it. Click the "..." button to see what tags, if any, the authors have used. Add any that you think are appropriate. Then click on the "Discussion" button for that page (to the right of the "Edit" button). Write a message with subject "Review". In a paragraph or two, address each of these questions. If there are any problems that need to be corrected, politely describe what corrections the writers should make.
Questions to answer
1. Does the report have all the required sections: Title, Introduction, Procedure, Results, and Conclusion (or a format that better fits the particular report)?
2. Is all of the spelling and grammar correct? Does the format match the template (text styles, horizontal lines, table of contents, etc.)
3. Does the introduction contain adequate background information and the purpose of the experiment?
4. Is the procedure detailed enough, and is it written in past tense, paragraph form?
5. Do the results include all the important data or observations?
6. Are the conclusions supported by the results of the experiment? Do the authors suggest further experiments?
7. Are references cited properly?
8. Do you have any other recommendations?